6/19 端午節放假，因此期末考安排在 6/12。請把這一頁當成答題檢核表：考試不是背頁面文字，而是用概念回答公司面對的選擇。June 19 is Dragon Boat Festival holiday, so the final exam is on June 12. Treat this page as an answer checklist: the exam is not about memorizing page text; it is about using concepts to answer firm choices.
6 月 19 日端午節放假，因此期末考在 6 月 12 日。這一頁不是讓你背答案，而是提醒你如何把整學期的概念組成一個可辯護的管理判斷。June 19 is Dragon Boat Festival holiday, so the final exam is on June 12. This page is not for memorizing answers; it shows how to assemble the semester concepts into a defensible management judgment.
好的期末答案要能做到四件事：看懂情境、選對框架、比較選項、說出風險與證據。只背名詞，通常無法回答國際企業管理的問題。A strong final answer does four things: read the context, choose the framework, compare options, and state risk with evidence. Memorizing terms usually cannot answer International Business questions.
這張圖是本週的閱讀地圖：先看關係，再讀細節。This diagram is the reading map for the week: see the relationships before the details.
這個流程是給你安排注意力用的。你可以先折疊起來，需要確認節奏或產出時再展開。This flow helps you manage attention. Keep it collapsed until you need to check pace or output.
先圈出題目要你判斷的對象、情境、限制與輸出格式。不要一看到關鍵字就開始背定義。Circle the object, context, constraints, and required output. Do not start by reciting definitions just because you see keywords.
產出：題目拆解表Output: Question breakdown table
從制度、交易、公司策略、營運與人力資源之中選出主框架，再補一個輔助框架。好答案通常不是概念越多越好，而是概念彼此能接起來。Choose a main framework from institutions, transactions, strategy, operations, or HRM, then add one supporting framework. Strong answers connect concepts; they do not pile up terms.
產出：主框架與輔助框架Output: Main and supporting framework
用「因為 A，所以 B；但 C 會限制這個判斷」的方式建立論證。每一段都要有選項、取捨與風險。Build the argument as 'because A, therefore B; however C limits the judgment.' Each paragraph needs options, trade-offs, and risk.
產出：三段式論證草稿Output: Three-part argument draft
證據可以來自課本、新聞、公司資料或《未生》場景，但每一個證據都必須服務你的判斷，不是用來塞滿篇幅。Evidence can come from the textbook, news, company material, or Misaeng scenes, but every piece must serve the judgment, not fill space.
產出：證據表Output: Evidence table
答案要有開頭判斷、中段分析、最後限制。開頭先講立場，最後說明什麼條件會讓你的答案改變。Start with your position, develop the analysis, and end with limits. State what condition would change your answer.
產出：完整答案Output: Full answer
交卷前檢查四件事：是否回答問題、是否比較選項、是否說出風險、是否有證據。Before submitting, check four things: did you answer the question, compare options, state risk, and use evidence?
產出：最後檢核Output: Final check
開頭要先回答題目，例如「我會選策略聯盟而非全資子公司」。定義可以放在後面，用來支撐判斷。Start by answering the question, such as 'I would choose a strategic alliance rather than a wholly owned subsidiary.' Definitions come later to support the judgment.
不要把 PESTEL、文化距離、進入模式、供應鏈分段堆疊。請寫出因果：制度風險提高監督成本，所以公司需要更高控制或更強治理條款。Do not stack PESTEL, cultural distance, entry mode, and supply chain in separate blocks. Write causality: institutional risk raises monitoring cost, so the firm needs more control or stronger governance clauses.
好答案會比較 A 與 B，並說明為什麼沒有選 B。只寫你支持的選項，通常看不出你真的理解取捨。A strong answer compares A and B and explains why B is not chosen. If you only write the option you support, the trade-off is unclear.
最後請寫出什麼條件會讓你改變答案，例如政策改變、合作夥伴不可靠、需求不確定、匯率波動或供應鏈斷裂。End by stating what condition would change your answer: policy change, unreliable partner, demand uncertainty, exchange-rate movement, or supply disruption.
| 答案段落Answer section | 要完成的事What it must do | 常見失誤Common mistake |
|---|---|---|
| 第一段Opening | 直接提出判斷與理由預告State judgment and preview reasons | 只寫課本定義Only writing textbook definitions |
| 第二段Analysis 1 | 用主框架解釋核心取捨Use main framework for the core trade-off | 概念沒有接到情境Concept not tied to context |
| 第三段Analysis 2 | 加入證據與反證Add evidence and counter-evidence | 只列新聞或劇情Only listing news or plot |
| 最後一段Limit | 說明風險與改變答案的條件State risk and condition that changes answer | 用口號收尾Ending with a slogan |
交卷前確認答案有四格：情境、選項、取捨、證據。缺一格，就補一段。Before submitting, check four boxes: context, options, trade-off, evidence. If one is missing, add a paragraph.
如果你引用《未生》，不能只說某角色很努力。請寫出角色位置、資訊限制、決策權與後果。If you use Misaeng, do not only say a character worked hard. State role position, information constraint, decision right, and consequence.
期末考引用《未生》時，場景要成為證據。請說明它支持哪一個概念，例如代理問題、內部公平、控制系統或跨部門協調。When using Misaeng in the final exam, the scene must be evidence. Explain which concept it supports: agency problem, internal equity, control system, or cross-functional coordination.
不要只說誰好誰壞。請說明他的職位、KPI、資訊與權力如何影響行為。Do not label characters as good or bad. Explain how position, KPI, information, and power shape behavior.
一段辦公室衝突可以連到授權、合資、外派、供應鏈或內部控制。重點是它如何幫你理解企業選擇。A workplace conflict can connect to licensing, joint venture, expatriation, supply chain, or internal control. The point is how it helps explain firm choice.
下面三組指令不是要你複製後交差，而是示範專家級 Prompt 如何把任務、角色、判準、限制與輸出格式講清楚。你可以照抄，也可以依照自己的案例修改。The three prompts below are not shortcuts. They show how expert prompts specify task, role, criteria, constraints, and output format. You may copy them or adapt them to your case.
考後請保留你的複習表，作為期末學習歷程整理的素材。After the exam, keep your review table as material for the final learning portfolio.
確認課本架構。Confirm textbook structure.
貿易與制度背景。Trade and institutional context.
跨國投資背景。Cross-border investment context.
創新與 R&D 背景。Innovation and R&D context.
用於劇情收束與角色確認。Use it for final scene and role confirmation.